Archive for July, 2011

Sachin Tendulkar AKA- God delivers his sermon for future of cricket!

The game of cricket has always been dynamic! The modern history of the game has seen advent of new formats and none has quite boosted this metamorphism as much as the advent of T20 cricket & its league format. As is the process with the rest of worldly things, the old guard is skeptical to change; while the other objective fraction deals with the challenges of change in an objective manner. One such objective voice that has seen cricket at closer quarters than most is that of Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar. In the euphoria of India’s magnificent win at the 2011 ICC world cup, a lot of media personalities interviewed the Indian stars. One such interview involved one of India’s finest cricket analysts Boria Majumdar interview Tendulkar. As part of the interview they discussed the future of ODI cricket! Tendulkar in his response was categorical in stating that the format needed a major overhauling. His suggestion was that ODI cricket has to be tweaked into a two innings 25 over format. He also gave valid reasons with which I as a cricket analyst agree completely. Refreshingly his views were not based on the commerce of cricket, but rather on strong cricketing reasons. It is unfortunate that in the euphoria of the world cup celebrations and the advent of IPL, the issue was not prodded further. But I guess now with bilateral cricket back in the forefront time is opportune to understand why the greatest Indian cricketer wanted these changes in the format.


The Dew Factor- Most of India’s home cricket and sub continent cricket at large is played in India’s winter season. This sees dew as a major factor governing all games.  It is no hidden fact that the toss in such a scenario plays a major role. The team winning the toss fields first and almost has 90% of the match in its grip. Bowlers bowling second are at a disadvantage, spinners are almost made redundant and chases of the highest of targets are made a mockery of! As a student of the game Tendulkar felt this was a serious threat to the sanctity of the game & therefore proposed the two innings format. What happens under his proposed situation is that both the teams get to bat half of their overs when the dew is absent, while they bat their respective remainders under similar conditions of dew. This makes the match more equitable and removes the dew factor as a deciding factor in results of the game.


Of course Tendulkar had promised to discuss the same with Majumdar at length in future! As a cricket fan I am sure me and many of you are waiting to prod the genius further on his proposal! However let me make a few points as to why Tendulkar’s proposal for future of ODI’s makes absolute sense.


  1. Majority of ODIs are played in the bilateral format – There is no doubt that the best testimonial to the ODI format came in way of the resounding success of the 2011 world cup. What with it being played in the nerve center of world cricket-India; topped with the hosts winning it! But the question is will the format still hold the interest for four long years, before the next world cup. The interim period is flooded with only bi-laterals save the Asia cup or certain triangular series. The on going India verses West Indies ODI series is testimonial to the fact of weaning interests not only amongst viewers, but also the top cricketers themselves. Also as is the case with the present Windies series, most bilateral matches feature the balance between the oppositions lop sided in favor of one team. The difference in standards between the top four nations and the rest is growing by the day; making matches one sided and predictable. Grafting of one’s and two’s in the middle overs, dibbly-dobby harmless wicket to wicket defensive bowling is certainly not what the viewers want to see; irrespective of its effectiveness in winning matches! This is what the cricket committee of ICC needs to look and introspect at! Especially with the ‘food for thought’ provided by the greatest ODI cricketer of all times.



  1. A More interesting and challenging Format Two 25 over innings with only 10 wickets ( both innings included) will test strategies, captains and skills of the players at the highest level. Imagine a match between India Vs Bangladesh at Chennai. In the present format if India scores 350+ batting first the chances of you switching channels at half time are much more than India batting the first 25 overs scoring 150/3  runs , followed by Bangladesh scoring  125/4 in its first innings. It is your guess now to decide if you would switch the channels by the start of the second India innings or not. If you are not salivating at the prospect already, imagine a similar situation when India is playing a stronger opponent like Australia or Pakistan in similar scenarios. I think Tendulkar has just scripted the biggest pot-boiler for the cricket fans of the world.


  1. T20 League cricket is here to stay- All said and done whether you hate the IPL or not! The fact is it is here to stay. ODI cricket has a legacy and has probably delivered two of the best five great moments of Indian sport over the last three decades. It would be a shame if ODI cricket would become extinct just because administrators and analysts of the game did not tweak it with changing times. Rather than waiting for IPL or league t20 cricket gobbling up the ODI format; administrators would be well advised to tweak the formats with changing times. The air time for these matches too remains the same if not more, making it equally interesting for broadcasters to sell their inventory. The ways forward for ODI cricket, especially in its bilateral form, is to co exist with T20 cricket. And for this it has to reinvent and repackage itself.


The biggest critics of this change would argue that India is the world champion in the existing format and that a change will dilute its world champion status. However I would tell them that the status is not permanent and 2015 will see India play the world cup in Australia, under conditions that suit opposing top sides more than them. Four years is also a long time to carry on the euphoria of a being a world champion. Numerous bi-lateral series in the interim will dilute that status.  Tendulkar may have already established his legacy on the field; whether his precursor in the field of cricket administration gets its due debate is for the ICC and cricket boards to decide.


Comments (1)